MIST

Magnetosphere, Ionosphere and Solar-Terrestrial

Latest news

2026 MIST Council Election Results

It is our pleasure to announce the results of the latest MIST Council Election.

  • Samuel Wharton (University of Leicester) is elected for a 3 year term as a MIST Councillor
  • Jewel Abbey Relampagos (Lancaster University) is elected for a 1 year term as the MIST Student Representative

In addition, due to concerns from the community regarding the ongoing UKRI/STFC funding situation, MIST Council have also decided to charter Mark Lester (University of Leicester) as an additional councillor to inform and steer the council in matters related to this specific brief, as set out in Article 4.5 of the MIST Charter.

We would like to congratulate everyone on their new roles. The full composition of Council can be found on the MIST website (https://www.mist.ac.uk/community/mist-council). We would like to thank all the candidates for putting themselves forward and everyone who took part in the voting. We received votes from 132 people which represents a turnout of 21.5% of people registered to receive the MIST emailing list.

Finally, MIST Council would like to extend their thanks and gratitude to our outgoing members: Fiona Ball and Georgios Nicolaou. We would also like to say a special thank you to Andy Smith who was co-opted to be on MIST council while Rosie Johnson was on maternity leave, thank you for all of your hard work.

Open Letter Ready For Signatories

Protect MIST Science! Sign the MIST Community Open Letter on the STFC funding cuts!

https://sites.google.com/view/uk-mist-community-open-letter

 

Statement from MIST Council regarding the STFC Funding Situation

Statement from MIST Council regarding the STFC Funding Situation

MIST Council is deeply concerned by the ongoing STFC funding uncertainty and its impact on our community and beyond.

The current combination of prospective delayed and reduced funding, together with already volatile financial situations at universities across the UK, is placing significant strain on research groups. In some cases, institutions may be unable to support researchers through gaps between projects, increasing precarity across the community and adding significant pressure on early-career researchers.

We are concerned that continued uncertainty risks accelerating a brain drain from the UK, as skilled researchers reconsider their future in a system offering limited stability. The loss of expertise at any career stage would have lasting consequences for UK space science.

 

What is going on?

For those that are unaware of the situation, it is complex and evolving. We suggest the following sources to get up to speed on the current developments.

https://www.sciencecampaign.org.uk/analysis-and-publications/detail/what-is-happening-with-ukri-funding-and-the-stfc-cuts/

https://ras.ac.uk/news-and-press/news/proposed-budget-cuts-catastrophe-uk-astronomy

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2514481-physicists-warn-of-catastrophic-impact-from-uk-science-cuts/

 

What are we doing about it?

Behind the scenes, MIST Council is actively engaging with relevant parties to understand the scale of the challenge and to identify constructive ways forward.

  • We are seeking seasoned members of the community to join MIST Council on a task force to help develop options and represent the needs of our community. If you would like to be involved, please reach out to us via the MIST Council email (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.) by the end of this week (13th February 2026).
  • In addition to the task force, we want to provide an open forum for discussion and collective input among all members of the wider MIST community. We are exploring options and will be in touch as soon as possible with further details.
  • We believe in working together in the face of the current challenges and we are collaborating with UKSP and others to strive for a fair and positive outcome for all. We are reaching out to members of the SSAP (Solar System Advisory Panel) to explore the hosting of a community town hall meeting, like the one already being organised by the AAP (Astronomy Advisory Panel), to provide an open forum for discussion and collective input.

 

What can you do to help?

There are several open letters representing people in various career stages that have been made available to sign. We encourage you to read the relevant letter(s) and to sign them if you support them:

The Royal Astronomical Society are also urging Fellows to lobby their MPs against the cuts, and have included a template letter that can be used to do so:
https://ras.ac.uk/news-and-press/news/ras-fellows-urged-lobby-against-unprecedented-cuts

 

MIST Council will continue to advocate for transparency, stability, and funding structures that recognise both the long-term nature of our science and the people who deliver it.
We thank you for your continued support in this period of uncertainty.

 

Please contact This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. if you have further suggestions.
MIST Council

Announcement of New MIST Council 2025

We are very pleased to announce the following members of the community have been elected to MIST Council:

  • Gemma Bower (University of Leicester), MIST Councillor
  • Tom Elsden (University of St Andrews), MIST Councillor
  • Cameron Patterson (Lancaster University), MIST Councillor
  • Fiona Ball (University of Southampton), Student Representative

They will begin their terms in July 2025.

We thank outgoing MIST Council members: Maria Walach, Chiara Lazzeri and Emma Woodfield. Andy Smith will remain on council a little longer as a co-opted member to cover Rosie Johnson's maternity leave.

The current composition of Council can be found on our website (https://www.mist.ac.uk/community/mist-council).

Announcement of New MIST Councillors.

We are very pleased to announce the following members of the community have been elected unopposed to MIST Council:

  • Rosie Johnson (Aberystwyth University), MIST Councillor
  • Matthew Brown (University of Birmingham), MIST Councillor
  • Chiara Lazzeri (MSSL, UCL), Student Representative

Rosie, Matthew, and Chiara will begin their terms in July. This will coincide with Jasmine Kaur Sandhu, Beatriz Sanchez-Cano, and Sophie Maguire outgoing as Councillors.

The current composition of Council can be found on our website, and this will be amended in July to reflect this announcement (https://www.mist.ac.uk/community/mist-council).

Nuggets of MIST science, summarising recent papers from the UK MIST community in a bitesize format.

If you would like to submit a nugget, please fill in the following form: https://forms.gle/DGNZiP7sA3e8U29ZA and we will arrange a slot for you in the schedule. Nuggets should be 100–300 words long and include a figure/animation. Please get in touch!
If you have any issues with the form, please contact This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. 

Quantifying the number of false positive substorms identified in the SuperMAG SML index arising from enhancements in magnetospheric convection

By Christian Lao (MSSL, University College London)

Substorms can be identified from negative bays in the SML index, which traces the minimum northward ground magnetic deflection at auroral latitudes, produced by enhancements of the westward electrojet. For substorms, negative bays are caused by the closure of the Substorm Current Wedge through the ionosphere, typically localized to the nightside and centred around 23-00 magnetic local time (MLT). In this case, the equivalent current pattern that causes the magnetic deflections is given the name Disturbance Polar (DP) 1. However, negative bays may also form when the westward electrojet is enhanced by increased convection, driving Pedersen and Hall currents in the auroral zone. Convection enhancements also strengthen the eastward electrojet, monitored by SMU index. In this case, the equivalent current pattern that produces the magnetic deflections is called DP2.

In this study, we investigated the contributions of the magnetic perturbations from the DP1 and DP2 current patterns to substorm-like magnetic bays identified in SML using the SOPHIE technique of Forsyth et al. (2015), https://doi.org/10.1002/2015ja021343. SOPHIE attempts to distinguish between the DP1 and DP2 enhancements, whereas other SML-based substorm identification methods don’t (e.g. Newell & Gjerloev, 2011; Ohtani+, 2020; etc). However, despite this, we find evidence that between 1997 and 2019 up to 59% of the 30,329 events originally identified by SOPHIE as substorms come from enhancements of DP2, which are unrelated to substorm phenomena, on top of the 2,627 convection enhancement events already identified. We highlight that any “substorm” list is, in fact, a list of magnetic enhancements, auroral enhancements, etc., which may or may not correspond to substorm activity and should be treated that way.

 

See publication for details:
Lao, C. J.Forsyth, C.Freeman, M. P., & Gjerloev, J. W. (2025). Separating DP1 and DP2 current pattern contributions to substorm-like intensifications in SMLJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics130, e2024JA033592. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033592

 

Estimating Electron Temperature and Density Using Van Allen Probe Data: Typical Behavior of Energetic Electrons in the Inner Magnetosphere

By Dovile Rasinskaite (Northumbria University)

The Earth’s inner magnetosphere contains multiple electron populations influenced by different factors. The cold electrons of the plasmasphere, warm plasma that contributes to the ring current, and the relativistic plasma of the radiation belts often seem to behave independently. Using omni-directional flux and energy measurements from the HOPE and MagEIS instruments aboard the Van Allen Probes, we provide a detailed density and temperature description of the inner magnetosphere, offering a comprehensive statistical analysis of the entire Van Allen Probe era. While number density and temperature data at geosynchronous orbit are available, this study focuses on the warm plasma in the inner magnetosphere (2<L*<6). Values of density and temperature are extracted by fitting energy and phase space density to obtain the distribution function. The fitted distributions are related to the zeroth and second moments to estimate the number density and temperature. Analysis has indicated that a two Maxwellian fit is sufficient over a wide range of L* and that there are two independent plasma populations. The more energetic population has a median number density of approximately 1.2 * 104 m-3 and a temperature of around 130 keV, with a temperature peak observed between L* = 4 and L* = 4.5. This population is relatively uniform in MLT. In contrast, the less energetic warm electron population has a median number density of about 2.5*104 m-3 and a temperature of 7.4 keV. Strong statistical trends in density and temperature across both L* and MLT are presented, along with potential sources driving these variations.

See publication for details:
Rasinskaite, D.Watt, C. E. J.Forsyth, C.Smith, A. W.Lao, C. J.Chakraborty, S., et al. (2025). Estimating electron temperature and density using Van Allen probe data: Typical behavior of energetic electrons in the inner magnetosphereJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics130, e2024JA033443. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033443

 

Dynamics of TEC High Density Regions Seen in JPL GIMs: Variations With Latitude, Season and Geomagnetic Activity

By Martin Cafolla (University of Warwick)

The ionosphere is a portion of the upper atmosphere of the Earth consisting of free electrons and ions as a result of exposure to solar radiation. The variability of intensity of this radiation, as well as the differing levels of geomagnetic activity, results in fluctuations in electron number density across the ionosphere, characterised by the Total Electron Content (TEC). We define High Density Regions (HDRs) of TEC, that is regions of enhanced line-integrated electron number density, as the top 1% of TEC measurements from Global Ionospheric Maps (GIMs). We then construct an algorithm that isolates, detects and tracks these regions for 20 years of TEC data in sun-centered geomagnetic coordinates. This produces a contiguous set of uniquely labelled space-time TEC HDRs. We conduct a statistical study to determine reproducible trends in HDR formation location, trajectories and durations for different levels of geomagnetic activity at continental and sub-continental (small) scales.

We find that HDR formation is primarily driven by the sub-solar point, spanning the afternoon ionosphere, and in general occurs around four magnetic latitude clusters. Small HDRs typically move along lines of constant magnetic latitude in the direction of Earth rotation, while continental scale HDRs have much more complex paths. The statistical nature of our results provides a probabilistic prediction on future HDR behaviour, offering an ensemble constraint on enhancements seen in ionospheric models.

Example TEC map for 2009-07-23 at 16:30:00 UTC. Panel (a) plots the geographic TEC map. Each 1 degree by 1 degree grid point plots the Vertical TEC at that longitude/latitude. Black triangles show the locations of ground stations. Panel (b) plots the geomagnetic TEC map with grey contours at the top 1% value of TEC in the map, defining the High Density Regions (HDRs). Panel (c) isolates these HDRs and plots them in black, with green contours drawn around each black region to demonstrate the algorithm’s contour detection. Panel (d) plots the isolated HDRs in SM coordinates with bounding rectangles in blue and centroids marked in black, obtained by the detection/tracking algorithm.

See publication for details:
Cafolla, M. A., Chapman, S. C., Watkins, N. W., Meng, X., & Verkhoglyadova, O. P. (2025). Dynamics of TEC high density regions seen in JPL GIMs: Variations with latitude, season and geomagnetic activity. Space Weather, 23, e2024SW004307. DOI: 10.1029/2024SW004307

Discovery of H3+ and infrared aurora at Neptune with JWST

By Henrik Melin (Northumbria University)

The molecular ion H3+ is a significant component of the ionospheres of the giant planets. By observing the near-infrared emission from this ion we can remotely diagnose the physical conditions of this region. This layer of the atmosphere is an importance conduit for energy transfer between the space environment, magnetic field, and the atmosphere below, and it is in this region that magnetospheric auroral currents deposit energetic electrons that form enhanced temperatures and densities of H3+.

H3+ was discovered at Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus over 30 years ago and a great number of studies have been able to characterise the processes that occur in the ionospheres of these planets. However, despite many attempts using telescopes on the ground, H3+ has never been observed from Neptune, in spite of models predicting it should be detectable, based on data from the 1989 Voyager 2 encounter.

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is the most powerful telescope ever put into space, designed to observe the first galaxies formed in the early Universe. We can leverage this extraordinary sensitivity to explore our own cosmic backyard, by pointing the telescope at the giant planets. The first JWST observations of Neptune were taken in June 2023, and we were able to detect H3+ for the first time (yay!), as well as localised H3+ emissions about the magnetic pole. In other words, we were able to detect the ionosphere and aurora of Neptune for the first time, exactly 100 years after it was discovered at the Earth (Appleton & Barnett, 1925).

See publication for details:
Melin et al., (2025), Nat. Astro., doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-025-02507-9

Can XMM-Newton Be Used to Track Compositional Changes in the Solar Wind?

By Simona Nitti (University of Leicester)

Continuous monitoring of the solar wind ion composition is vital for understanding solar-terrestrial interactions, particularly through the study of Solar Wind Charge Exchange (SWCX) emission. SWCX produces soft X-rays (<2 keV) when highly charged solar wind ions (e.g., O7+, O8+, C6+) interact with neutral atoms. This emission is ubiquitous across the solar system, occurring wherever the solar wind encounters interstellar neutrals or interacts with planetary environments, including those of Earth, Mars, Venus, Jupiter, and Pluto.

In this study (https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033323), we investigated whether SWCX emission from Earth’s exosphere, observed by the XMM-Newton telescope, can be used to infer solar wind composition. By comparing spectral line intensities extracted from XMM data with ion abundance measurements from the ACE spacecraft at L1, we found that OVIII emission closely tracks O8+ abundances. In contrast, other ions involved in the SWCX process—such as O7+, C6+, C5+, and Mg11+—do not exhibit a consistent correlation between their abundance and X-ray emission.

To explore whether XMM data still encodes information about the solar wind state, we employed a Random Forest Classifier to predict solar wind types, following the classification scheme by Koutroumpa (2024). Incorporating XMM features alongside proton parameters significantly improved model performance, with a macro-averaged F1 score of 0.80 ± 0.06, compared to 0.55 when using proton data alone. Notably, XMM emission features ranked among the top five most important inputs. Moreover, XMM emission features ranked among the top five most important predictors. This suggests that, while individual ion abundances cannot currently be inferred directly from emission fluxes, XMM still provides valuable insight into the solar wind type, from which an average compositional profile may be inferred. This work is particularly timely given the degradation of the heavy ion spectrometer onboard the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE), which has left the scientific community without reliable near-Earth ion composition measurements since 2011.

(a) SWCX periods ACE O8+/p (where p is proton density) 2D histograms, averaged over their occurrence between 2000 and 2009, in a (O7+/O6+)×(C6+/C5+) space, with black lines separating different solar wind types.
(b). Occurrence rate of ACE O8+/p for the Streamer (black), Outlier (red) wind and ICMEs (green).
(c) (d) Same as left plots but for OVIII ion line fluxes from the XMM SWCX data set.

See publication for details:

Nitti, S.Carter, J. A.Sembay, S. F.Milan, S. E.Zhao, L.Lepri, S. T., & Kuntz, K. D. (2024). Can XMM-Newton be used to track compositional changes in the solar wind? Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics129, e2024JA033323. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JA033323