MIST

Magnetosphere, Ionosphere and Solar-Terrestrial

Latest news

Charter amendment and MIST Council elections open

Nominations for MIST Council open today and run through to 8 August 2021! Please feel free to put yourself forward for election – the voting will open shortly after the deadline and run through to the end of August. The positions available are:

  • 2 members of MIST Council
  • 1 student representative (pending the amendment below passing)

Please email nominations to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. by 8 August 2021. Thank you!

Charter amendment

We also move to amend the following articles of the MIST Charter as demonstrated below. Bold type indicates additions and struck text indicates deletions. Please respond to the email on the MIST mailing list before 8 August 2021 if you would like to object to the amendment; MIST Charter provides that it will pass if less than 10% of the mailing list opposes its passing. 

4.1  MIST council is the collective term for the officers of MIST and consists of six individuals and one student representative from the MIST community.

5.1 Members of MIST council serve terms of three years, except for the student representative who serves a term of one year.

5.2 Elections will be announced at the Spring MIST meeting and voting must begin within two months of the Spring MIST meeting. Two slots on MIST council will be open in a given normal election year, alongside the student representative.

5.10 Candidates for student representative must not have submitted their PhD thesis at the time that nominations close.

SSAP roadmap update

The STFC Solar System Advisory Panel (SSAP) is undertaking a review of the "Roadmap for Solar System Research", to be presented to STFC Science Board later this year. This is expected to be a substantial update of the Roadmap, as the last full review was carried out in 2012, with a light-touch update in 2015.

The current version of the SSAP Roadmap can be found here.

In carrying out this review, we will take into account changes in the international landscape, and advances in instrumentation, technology, theory, and modelling work. 

As such, we solicit your input and comments on the existing roadmap and any material we should consider in this revision. This consultation will close on Wednesday 14 July 2021 and SSAP will try to give a preliminary assessment of findings at NAM.

This consultation is seeking the view of all members of our community and we particularly encourage early career researchers to respond. Specifically, we invite:

Comments and input on the current "Roadmap for Solar System Research" via the survey by clicking here.

Short "white papers" on science investigations (including space missions, ground-based experimental facilities, or computing infrastructure) and impact and knowledge exchange (e.g. societal and community impact, technology development). Please use the pro-forma sent to the MIST mailing list and send your response to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Quo vadis interim board

 

A white paper called "Quo vadis, European space weather community" has been published in J. Space Weather Space Clim. which outlines plans for the creation of an organisation to represent the European space weather community.
Since it was published, an online event of the same name was organised on 17 March 2021. A “Quo Vadis Interim Board” was then set up, to establish a mechanism for this discussion, which will go on until June 21st.

The Interim Board is composed of volunteers from the community in Europe. Its role is to coordinate the efforts so that the space weather (and including space climate) European community can:

  1. Organise itself
  2. Elect people to represent them

To reach this goal, the Interim Board is inviting anyone interested in and outside Europe to join the “Quo Vadis European Space Weather Community ” discussion forum.

Eligible European Space Weather Community members should register to the “Electoral Census” to be able to vote in June for the final choice of organisation.

This effort will be achieved through different actions indicated on the Quo Vadis webpage and special Slack workspace.

Call for applications for STFC Public Engagement Early-Career Researcher Forum

 

The STFC Public Engagement Early-Career Researcher Forum (the ‘PEER Forum’) will support talented scientists and engineers in the early stages of their career to develop their public engagement and outreach goals, to ensure the next generation of STFC scientists and engineers continue to deliver the highest quality of purposeful, audience-driven public engagement.

Applications are being taken until 4pm on 3 June 2021. If you would like to apply, visit the PEER Forum website, and if you have queries This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

The PEER Forum aims:

  • To foster peer learning and support between early career scientists and engineers with similar passion for public engagement and outreach, thus developing a peer support network that goes beyond an individual’s term in the forum 
  • To foster a better knowledge and understanding of the support mechanisms available from STFC and other organisations, including funding mechanisms, evaluation, and reporting. As well as how to successfully access and utilise this support 
  • To explore the realities of delivering and leading public engagement as an early career professional and build an evidence base to inform and influence STFC and by extension UKRI’s approaches to public engagement, giving an effective voice to early career researchers

What will participation in the Forum involve?

Participants in the PEER Forum will meet face-to-face at least twice per year to share learning and to participate in session that will strengthen the depth and breadth of their understanding of public engagement and outreach.

Who can apply to join the Forum?

The PEER Forum is for practising early-career scientists and engineers who have passion and ambition for carrying out excellent public engagement alongside, and complementary to, their career in science or engineering. We are seeking Forum members from across the breadth of STFC’s pure and applied science and technology remit.

The specific personal requirements of PEER Forum membership are that members:

  • Have completed (or currently studying for – including apprentices and PhD students) their highest level of academic qualification within the last ten years (not including any career breaks)
  • Are employed at a Higher Education Institute, or a research-intensive Public Sector Research Organisation or Research Laboratory (including STFC’s own national laboratories)
  • Work within a science and technology field in STFC’s remit, or with a strong inter-disciplinary connection to STFC’s remit, or use an STFC facility to enable their own research
  • Clearly describe their track record of experience in their field, corresponding to the length of their career to date
  • Clearly describe their track record of delivering and leading, or seeking the opportunity to lead, public engagement and/or outreach
  • Can provide insight into their experiences in public engagement and/or outreach and also evidence one or more of
  • Inspiring others
  • Delivering impact
  • Demonstrating creativity
  • Introducing transformative ideas and/or inventions
  • Building and sustaining collaborations/networks
  • Are keen communicators with a willingness to contribute to the success of a UK-wide network
  • https://stfc.ukri.org/public-engagement/training-and-support/peer-forum/  

    Astronet Science Vision & Infrastructure Roadmap

     

    Astronet is a consortium of European funding agencies, established for the purpose of providing advice on long-term planning and development of European Astronomy. Setup in 2005, its members include most of the major European astronomy nations, with associated links to the European Space Agency, the European Southern Observatory, SKA, and the European Astronomical Society, among others. The purpose of the Science Vision and Infrastructure Roadmap is to deliver a coordinated vision covering the entire breadth of astronomical research, from the origin and early development of the Universe to our own solar system.

    The first European Science Vision and Infrastructure Roadmap for Astronomy was created by Astronet, using EU funds, in 2008/09, and updated in 2014/15. Astronet is now developing a new Science Vision & Infrastructure Roadmap, in a single document with an outlook for the next 20 years. A delivery date to European funding agencies of mid-2021 is anticipated. 

    The Science Vision and Infrastructure Roadmap revolves around the research themes listed below:

    • Origin and evolution of the Universe
    • Formation and evolution of galaxies
    • Formation & evolution of stars
    • Formation & evolution of planetary systems
    • Understanding the solar system and conditions for life

    but will include cross-cutting aspects such as computing and training and sustainability.

     

    After some delays due to the global pandemic, the first drafts of the chapters for the document are now available from the Panels asked to draft them, for you to view and comment on. For the Science Vision & Roadmap to be truly representative it is essential we take account of the views of as much of the European astronomy and space science community as possible – so your input is really valued by the Panels and Astronet. Please leave any comments, feedback or questions on the site by 1 May 2021.

    It is intended that a virtual “town hall” style event will be held in late Spring 2021, where an update on the project and responses to the feedback will be provided.

    Nuggets of MIST science, summarising recent papers from the UK MIST community in a bitesize format.

    If you would like to submit a nugget, please contact This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will arrange a slot for you in the schedule. Nuggets should be 100–300 words long, include a figure/animation, and include an affiliation with a UK MIST institute. Please get in touch!

    Comparing electron precipitation fluxes calculated from pitch angle diffusion coefficients to LEO satellite observations

    By Jade Reidy (British Antarctic Survey)

    Trapped radiation belt particles can be pitch angle scattered into the loss cone by resonant wave-particle interactions and atmospheric collisions. This high-energy electron input into our atmosphere can affect the atmospheric chemistry and is a significant loss mechanism of particles from the radiation belts, which themselves pose a threat to satellites. Reidy et al (2021) calculates the precipitating flux that would be measured inside the field of view of an electron detector on board a low earth orbiting satellite (POES) using wave particle theory and compares to in-situ data. These calculations depend on diffusion coefficients for whistler mode chorus waves, plasmaspheric hiss waves and atmospheric collisions. The diffusion coefficients used in Reidy et al (2021) were derived for use in the British Antarctic Survey Radiation Belt Model (BAS-RBM). The analysis presented in this paper is a direct test of the how well the diffusion coefficients used in the BAS‐RBM are able to quantify the precipitating flux and therefore a first step toward testing the loss due to precipitation within the BAS‐RBM itself.

    Figure 1 shows a global plot of the linear correlation between the calculated precipitating flux and that measured by the POES T0 >30 keV electron channel between 26–30 March 2013. Our results show the best correlation on the dawnside for L* > 5; this agreement is consistent with chorus waves being the dominant scattering mechanism in this MLT and L-shell zone, suggesting that chorus-driven scattering is well represented in the BAS-RBM. However, we consistently underestimate the precipitating flux on the duskside, suggesting we are likely missing some diffusion here; potential causes of this underestimate are discussed in the paper. Reidy et al (2021) also demonstrates the potential of using wave particle theory to reconstruct the total precipitating flux over the entire loss cone, some of which is missed by the POES detector due to its limited field of view, finding that the total precipitating flux can exceed that measured by POES by a factor of 10.

    A figure showing the correlation between calculated and precipitating flux as a function of space.

    Figure 1: Linear correlation coefficient between calculated and measured precipitating flux in bins of 3 hour MLT and 0.5 L*, where noon is to the top and dawn to the right. The correlation is only shown where the confidence level is over 95%.

    Please see the paper for full details:

    Reidy, J. A., Horne, R. B., Glauert, S. A., Clilverd, M. A., Meredith, N. P., Woodfield, E. E., et al. (2021). Comparing electron precipitation fluxes calculated from pitch angle diffusion coefficients to LEO satellite observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 126, e2020JA028410. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028410

    Simultaneous Observation of an Auroral Dawn Storm with the Hubble Space Telescope and Juno

    By Ben Swithenbank-Harris (University of Leicester)

    Jupiter’s dawn storms are bright enhancements of the dawn flank of the main auroral emission, and produce the most powerful auroral events in the Solar System. These events have been observed numerous times with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), and more recently by the Juno spacecraft, but their exact origins and related magnetospheric dynamics are not fully understood. For example, although consistent observations of this phenomena near local dawn suggested a relationship with the impinging solar wind, previous studies have shown no correlation between storm occurrence and solar wind conditions. Additionally, prior to the arrival of the Juno spacecraft at Jupiter in July 2016, auroral observations of dawn storms had not been supported by magnetospheric data from spacecraft in the dawn magnetosphere.

    In this work, we present the first simultaneous magnetospheric in situ and auroral observations of the onset of a dawn storm. Magnetometer readings reveal brief reversals in the azimuthal magnetic field and decreases in the radial and total field magnitudes around the time of storm onset (Figure 1a-d). Furthermore, concurrent JADE (Figure 1e-h) and JEDI (Figure 1k-n) particle measurements reveal an increase in high energy particle populations and acceleration of magnetospheric protons towards corotational speeds, as well as long-lived hot plasma populations which persist in the outer magnetosphere beyond the expected lifetime of the enhanced auroral emissions. Ultimately, we associate this dawn storm with significant plasma heating and acceleration following reconnection at earlier local times.

    Multi-panel plot showing time series of Juno observations.

    Figure 1: Overview of the Juno in situ data, showing (1a-d) the radial, north-south, azimuthal and total magnetic field strength (nT) in cylindrical polar coordinates, (1e-h) the JADE ion time-of-flight energy spectra, electron and proton temperatures (K), number densities (cm-3) and proton azimuthal velocities (km s-1), (1i-j) Waves high frequency and electric field continuum emissions, (1k-n) JEDI particle spectra showing the total particle and proton energies (k-l) and the proton and heavy ion pitch angle distributions (m-n), (1o) and the expected spacecraft distance from the centre of the current sheet (RJ), calculated using the method of Khurana (1992). The light grey shaded regions show the times of HST observations, with the dawn storm interval denoted by the yellow shaded region. The darker grey shading denotes a magnetopause crossing, and the three dotted vertical lines mark the times of several successive reversals in the azimuthal magnetic field.

    Please see the paper for full details:

    Swithenbank‐Harris, B.G., Nichols, J.D., Allegrini, F., Bagenal, F., Bonfond, B., Bunce, E.J., et al. (2021). Simultaneous Observation of an Auroral Dawn Storm with the Hubble Space Telescope and Juno. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 126, e2020JA028717. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028717 

    Pro‐L* ‐ A probabilistic L* mapping tool for ground observations

    By Rhys Thompson (University of Reading)

    Both ground and space observations are used extensively in the modeling of space weather processes within the Earth's magnetosphere. The shape of the magnetic field is not fixed, however, and there is not a consistent relationship between the footprint location  of a ground measurement and its respective position in space. With no way to validate the global true magnetic field, numerous models exist to approximate it, allowing a subset of locations on the ground (mainly sub‐auroral) to be mapped along field lines to a location in space.

    We often envision the radiation belts in a fixed coordinate system representative of the motions of the trapped particles. Often considered a proxy for distance is L*, a quantity related to the radial motion of electrons. Once an observation's respective location in the magnetic field is approximated it can be transformed into L*, provided the electrons at the measurement's physical location remain trapped by the Earth’s magnetic field.

    Dependency of L* on magnetic field model accuracy is therefore paramount, however these models can significantly disagree on mapped L* values for a single point on the ground, during both quiet times and storms.

    We present a state‐of‐the‐art tool, Pro‐L*, which for any ground observation provides the probabilities of corresponding L* values. Usage is highlighted for both event studies (a simple demonstration can be seen in Figure 1) and statistical models, and we demonstrate a number of potential applications. Pro-L* may be accessed as a freely available Python package at https://github.com/Rhyst223/pro-lstar.git.

    Timeseries during a geomagnetic storm. Panels show the level of activity and the L* value according to multiple models at different geomagnetic latitudes.

    Figure 1: The L* response of magnetic field models to the 17-18 March 2013 storm enhancement, for a selection of magnetic latitudes at 330 degrees magnetic longitude, where ground observations are frequently of interest. The median probabilistic L* is also given provided that at least 3 magnetic field models return an L* value. All returned L* are normalised by their respective constant dipole approximation for comparison of latitudes on the same scale. The Dst and Kp indices are also provided over the given time period. Shaded bars indicate times where observed values are on the nightside.

    Please see the paper for full details:

    Thompson, R. L., Morley, S. K., Watt, C. E. J., Bentley, S. N., & Williams, P. D. (2020). Pro‐L* ‐ A probabilistic L* mapping tool for ground observations. Space Weather, 18, e2020SW002602. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002602 

    Comparative Analysis of the Various Generalized Ohm’s Law Terms in Magnetosheath Turbulence as Observed by Magnetospheric Multiscale

    By Julia E. Stawarz (Imperial College London)

    Complex, highly nonlinear, turbulent dynamics play an important role in particle acceleration and plasma heating throughout the Universe by transferring energy from large-scale to small-scale fluctuations that can be more easily dissipated. Electric fields (E) in these plasmas are responsible for mediating energy exchange between the magnetic fields and particle motions and, therefore, can provide key insight into both the nonlinear dynamics of the turbulence and the processes responsible for dissipating the fluctuations. In the collisionless plasmas often found in space, E is described by generalized Ohm’s law, displayed in Fig. 1.

    In Stawarz et al. (2021), we directly measure nearly all the terms in generalized Ohm’s law for several intervals in Earth’s magnetosheath and, for the first time, examine how Ohm’s law shapes the turbulent E at different length scales. Many terms in Ohm’s law, require the computation of small-scale gradients, and, therefore, the unique high-resolution, multi-spacecraft measurements from NASA’s Magnetospheric Multiscale mission were necessary to perform the study. As seen in Fig. 1, we find that, at scales larger than the proton inertial length, the observed E is given by the ideal magnetohydrodynamic term, while, at sub-proton scales, a combination of the Hall and electron pressure terms control E, as expected. Other terms, related to the difference between proton and electron inertia and the finite mass of electrons, remain small across the observable scales. Within the paper, we explore the interplay of the various terms in further detail by examining the correlation between the Hall and electron pressure terms, which provides insight into the types of sub-proton-scale structures formed, and by exploring the relative contribution of linear and nonlinear terms in Ohm’s law at different scales.

    The Figure shows an equation for the Generalised Ohm's law at the top. Below a plot shows spectra of the terms in Ohm's law.

    Fig.1: (Top) Generalized Ohm’s law for a collisionless, two species plasma, highlighting the different dynamical effects that can support E. (Bottom) Spectra of the terms in Ohm’s law and the observed E for an interval of turbulence in Earth’s magnetosheath. Vertical lines denote the proton and electron gyroradii (ρi/e), inertial lengths (di/e), and spacecraft formation size.

    Please see the paper for full details: 

    J. E. Stawarz, L. Matteini, T. N. Parashar, L. Franci, J. P. Eastwood, C. A. Gonzalez, I. L. Gingell, J. L. Burch, R. E. Ergun, N. Ahmadi, B. L. Giles, D. J. Gershman, O. Le Contel, P.-A. Lindqvist, C. T. Russell, R. J. Strangeway, and R. B. Torbert (2021). Comparative Analysis of the Various Generalized Ohm’s Law Terms in Magnetosheath Turbulence as Observed by Magnetospheric Multiscale. J. Geophys. Res., 126, e2020JA028447, doi:10.1029/2020JA028447.

    Design and Optimization of a High-Time-Resolution Magnetic Plasma Analyzer (MPA)

    By Benjamin Criton (Mullard Space Science Laboratory, UCL)

    Cutting-edge solar wind investigations require in-situ instruments with increasing time and energy resolution to study the important small-scale plasma processes. These processes play key roles in the overall behaviour of space plasmas. They are believed to be the origin of the heating and acceleration of the solar wind. Unfortunately, these processes happen on very short timescales. To measure them, virtually all flown plasma analyzers use an approach to select particle energies, achieved by an electric field. Faraday cups use a high-pass energy selection whilst electrostatic analysers (ESAs) a band-pass selection. This functioning requires to sweep the energy range to build the entire energy spectrum of the measured plasma. Even though Faraday cups are comparatively faster than ESAs, these two instrument categories make relatively slow measurements: 4 s for Cluster HIA, 1 s for Solar Orbiter PAS or 0.22 s for Parker Solar Probe SPC.

    In this article, we conceptualize and design a plasma analyzer answering this rising demand for high time and energy resolution. Our new design, based on the velocity-dependent deflection of charged particles in a homogeneous magnetic field, does not require any time-dependent energy selection, making measurements much faster and reliable compared to traditional analyzers. Particles hit a position-sensitive sensor at different positions according to their velocity and mass-per-charge ratio. In one acquisition step, each incoming charged plasma particle is detected at a specific position in the sensor plane. We then translate the counts per position into an estimation of the velocity distribution function (VDF). Our study shows that this measurement principle achieves a 1D measurement of proton and alpha-particle VDFs under realistic solar wind conditions in 5 ms (200 Hz) with a velocity resolution of 2.8 %. This time cadence is two orders of magnitudes faster than the sampling frequency required to measure processes of order the proton gyro-radius at a heliocentric distance of 1 au and about 40 times faster than Parker Solar Probe SPC’s native cadence. Furthermore, the velocity/energy resolution only depends on the physical instrument parameters (aperture size, pixel size and magnetic field strength) that can be adjusted to best address the trade-off between time and energy resolution.

    A schematic showing the instrument geometry from viewpoints.

    Fig. 1 shows the conceptual geometry of the instrument. This new instrument concept is able to unveil the fast variations of the ion VDFs in one look direction.

    Please see the paper for full details: 

    Criton B, Nicolaou G, Verscharen D. (2020). Design and Optimization of a High-Time-Resolution Magnetic Plasma Analyzer (MPA). Applied Sciences. 10(23):8483. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238483